MOBILE COLUMNS LIFTS TRUCK
RAVAGLIOLI RAV261

RAVAGLIOLI RAV261 electro-mechanical mobile column lifts. Set of 4 columns. Max load 8500 kg per column. Individually controllable or synchronized movements.

Apr 18, 2024

8500 kg / 18739 lbs
max load
1.76 mt / 5.77 ft
max height
4x 460 kg / 1014 lbs
weight

ask for information
download

photos MOBILE COLUMNS LIFTS TRUCK RAVAGLIOLI RAV261

mobile-columns-lifts-truck ravaglioli rav261 photos

worldwide delivery
available

delivery time
90 days + shipping

payment terms
30% at order - 70% before shipping

wrong translation?

product reference MOBILE COLUMNS LIFTS TRUCK RAVAGLIOLI RAV261

  • category: MOBILE COLUMNS LIFTS TRUCK
  • brand: RAVAGLIOLI
  • model: RAV261
  • country of origin: ITALY
  • SKU code: RAVPRMCL1023
  • HS/HTS code (Harmonized Tariff Schedule): (*)
  • NCM code: (*)
  • availability: OnlineOnly
  • item condition: NewCondition

(*) HS/HTS/NCM codes may be incorrect, please request a verification before to place the order.

e.u. guarantee

E.U. legislation provides a Free of charge, 2 years guarantee for private person, and 1 year for company (legal guarantee) on faulty goods, for all products we sell, this is important because it is a guarantee that the goods sold by us are covered by European protection. All goods we sell are invoiced by Silcom North UAB, a company registered in Vilnius, Lithuania. Every product we send is checked before departure, but in case there are any problems, the customer is required to notify us as soon as possible, and must not use the product until our withdrawal. In case the customer needs a repair, we are always available to assist him, even after the warranty expires.

why choose us

Because for 50 years we have been dealing with industrial supplies, we have seen technology evolve and needs change. Because we are used to working with customers from all over the world, because we believe that after-sales service is as important as the technical preparation of our staff. We like to listen to requests, and propose the best solutions.



wrong translation? suggest correction